As noted in prior posts about Project Sherlock, we have acquired knowledge from a biology textbook to build the business case for applications like Inquire. We reported our results at SemTech recently. The slides are available here.
systems that know and understand and think and learn
Links
- Acquiring Knowledge From Text (2013)
- Anybody can KA w/ KnowBuddy™ (2012 ppt)
- Confessions of a Production Rule Vendor
- Haley Authority Tutorial (2007 pdf)
- Haley NL/KA Patents
- KnowBuddy™ and the Linguist™
- Linguist™ and Vulcan's Project Halo
- Linguist™ articles
- Opportunistic Backward Chaining (1991)
- Semantic Standards for Agility (2007 pdf)
- What about Why? (2011 ppt)
Search
-
Recent Posts
- Simon Says
- Character by character sentiment
- Importing documents into a knowledge base
- Is business logic too much for classical logic?
- Simply Smarter Intelligent Agents
- Problems with Probabilistic Parsing
- Confessions of a production rule vendor (part 2)
- Simply Logical English
- Natural Intelligence
- Iterative Disambiguation
- “Only full page color ads can run on the back cover of the New York Times Magazine.”
- “I don’t own a TV set. I would watch it.”
- Are vitamins subject to sales tax in California?
- Common sense about deep learning
- Dictionary Knowledge Acquisition
- ‘believed by many’
- Parsing Winograd Challenges
- Nominal semantics of ‘meaning’
- TA/NLP: It’s a jungle out there!
- Ending Back Pain with AI
Categories
- Business Intelligence
- Business planning
- Business Process Management
- Business Rules Management
- Complex Event Processing
- Compliant Governance
- Decision Management
- Educational Technology
- Formal Logic
- Knowledge Engineering
- Knowledge Management
- Learning
- Machine Learning
- Methodology
- Natural Language
- Ontology
- Predictive Analytics
- Question Answering
- Requirements
- Rules Engines
- Semantic Web
- Social Networks
- Speech Recgonition
- Standards
- Uncategorized
- Vision
Archives
- October 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- November 2016
- October 2015
- September 2014
- August 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- December 2012
- June 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
Calendar
Pages
Meta
© 2019 Commercial Intelligence | Powered by WordPress
A WordPress theme by Ravi Varma
[…] last week, a few companies asked me how to respond to IBM’s Watson given my involvement with rapid knowledge acquisition for deep question answering at Vulcan. My answer varies with whether there is any subject matter […]
[…] of their answers and explanations). The result of this parsing is, as we’ve described elsewhere, precise lexical, syntactic, semantic, and logic understanding of each sentence in the content. […]
[…] For example, compare the logical forms in the Groningen Meaning Bank with the logic produced by the Linguist. The former uses CCG to produce lambda calculus while the latter uses HPSG to produce predicate […]